Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010123792025 2026:GAU-AS:1084 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./233/2025 BIDHAN CHANDRA ROY SON OF LATE ROSHENDRA MOHAN ROY @ ROSHENDA ROY R/O HAILAKANDI, TOWN, WARD NO. 3, P.O., P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM VERSUS KANU DEBNATH SON OF LATE NONI GOPAL VILL/TOWN HAILAKANDI TOWN, WARD NO. X, P.O, P.S. AND DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BARBHUIYA, MS A BEGUM,MS S R MAZARBHUIYA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. M J QUADIR, MR. A K HANNAN Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 30.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. A.M. Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.J. Quadir, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for both the sides that the amount in question has been paid by the accused petitioner to the sole respondent/complainant as per compromise agreement and hence, no cause survives for adjudication. 3. The impugned judgment and order dated 06.03.2025, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hailakandi in Criminal Appeal No.06/2024, as well as the impugned judgment and order dated 30.12.2023, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hailakandi in N.I Case No.61/2019 under Section 138 of N.I Act are therefore set aside, in view of the compromise effected between the parties. 4. Accordingly, the criminal revision petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant