[2026:RJ-JP:32517] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8359/2026 CNR: RJHC020511792026 | URN: CRLMB / 15230U / 2026 1 Ajeet @ Pappu S/o Nawaldas, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Patpara Mohalla, Police Station Mathura, Gate, Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). 2 Devendra @ Dinesh S/o Nawaldas, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Patpara Mohalla, Police Station Mathura, Gate, Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). 3 Rohitash Kumar S/o Nawaldas, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Patpara Mohalla, Police Station Mathura, Gate, Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Navankur Dubey For State : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Mathuria HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 17/08/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 20.05.2026, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bharatpur, in Bail Application No.259/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioners was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.225/2026, Police Station- Mathura Gate, District-Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 110 & 117(2) of the BNS, 2023. [2026:RJ-JP:32517] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8359/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the FIR. He further submits that there is no injury which could lead to culpable homicide or death of any person. He further submits that there was one case reported to be pending against the petitioners, which of the year 2022, in which they have been acquitted. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the challan has been filed under Section 110 of the BNS, 2023, in which the maximum punishment is 7 years and the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, he prays that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail as the accused-petitioners are in custody since 14.05.2026. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant/respondent vehemently oppose the present bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant/ respondent and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that the challan has been filed under Section 110 of the BNS, 2023, in which the maximum punishment is 7 years; the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time; there was one case reported to be pending against the petitioners which of the year 2022, in which they have been acquitted and considering the nature of injuries, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted. [2026:RJ-JP:32517] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8359/2026] 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely - (i) Ajeet @ Pappu S/o Nawaldas, (ii) Devendra @ Dinesh S/o Nawaldas & (iii) Rohitash Kumar S/o Nawaldas arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.225/2026, Police Station-Mathura Gate, District- Bharatpur, shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioners shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected; (iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 13/MAHIMA