Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12094 (JHR)

LAMBODAR MAHATO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2463/2026 · 2026-05-06

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:14033 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2463 of 2026 --------- 1. Lambodar Mahato, aged 37 years, S/o Mani Nath Mahato, R/o Village- Chainpur, P.O. Rahe, P.S.-Sonahatu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. Sushma Kumari, aged 42 years, C/o Niranjan Mahato, R/o Village- Sundardih, P.O. Janumpiri, P.S.- Tamar, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Prem Ranjan, aged 44 years, C/o Niranjan Mahato, R/o Village- Sundardih, P.O.- Janumpiri, P.S.- Tamar, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Chhabi Nath Oraon, aged 35 years, S/o Bandhan Oraon, R/o Village- Jinda Chatti Toli, P.O.- Bargaon, P.S.- Sisai, District- Gumla, Jharkhand. 5. Lochan Kumar Saw, aged 34 years, S/o Bhuwneshwar Saw, R/o Village- Chhotki Bergi, Ρ.Ο.- Chalmo Barhmasiya, P.S.- Dumri, District- Giridih, Jharkhand. 6. Cornelius Dhanwar, aged 43 years, S/o Helarius Dhanwar, R/o Village- Panduloya, P.O.- Rampur, P.S.-Kurkura, District- Gumla, Jharkhand. 7. Sushil Kumar, aged 37 years, C/o Gangadhar Mahato, R/o Village Barudih, P.O.- Barudih, P.S. Sonahatu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 8. Jitendra Baraik, aged 35 years, S/o Somra Baraik, R/o Village- Hami Danr Toli, P.O. Hami, P.S.- Mahuadanr, District- Latehar, Jharkhand. 9. Arvind Kumar Mahato, aged 40 years, C/o Srishtidhar Mahato, R/o Village- Mawadih, P.O. & P.S.- Silli, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 10. Trilochan Mahato, aged 38 years, S/o Chamari Mahato, R/o Village- Sutilong, P.O.- Burhadih, P.S.-Bundu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 11. Dhaneshwar Mahato, aged 35 years, C/o Baghirath Mahato, R/o Village- Bhagadih, P.O.- Bhagadih, P.S.-Bundu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 12. Sanjay Kumar Mahato, aged 38 years, S/o Ganesh Mahato, R/o Village- Dalkidih, P.O.- Reladih, P.S.- Bundu, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand though the chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, 3. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, PO- Dhurwa, PS-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, 4. The Chairman Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having 2026:JHHC:14033 2 office at Kalinagar, Chai Bagan, PO & PS-Namkum, District- Ranchi. 5. The Secretary, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having office at Kalinagar, Chai Bagan, PO & PS-Namkum, District- Ranchi 6. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, having office at Kalinagar, Chai Bagan, PO & PS- Namkum, District-Ranchi. ....Respondent(s) --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Sonal tiwary, A.C. to A.G. M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Prince Kumar, Rakesh Kumar, Jay Prakash, Advocates --------- 02/Dated:-06.05.2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be given liberty to approach the One-Man Judicial Committee which has been constituted pursuant to the order of this Court in W.P. (S) No. 582 of 2023 with analogous cases. 2. There is no objection from the respondents. 3. Having regard to the above, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the One Man Judicial Committee within a period of two weeks. (Deepak Roshan, J.) MAY 06, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 12/05/2026