IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10966 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2025 Thana- SANDESH District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Pintu Kumar S/O Upendra Singh Resident of Village- Khanet, P.S.- Pawna, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 18212 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2025 Thana- SANDESH District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Amit Kumar @ Anil Kumar S/O- Sohan Singh R/O Village- Padma, PS- Pawana, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 10966 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Akanksha Malviya, Advocate Mr.Akash Keshar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 18212 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 16-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 223/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) of B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10966 of 2026(3) dt.16-04-2026 2/2 committed loot of Rs. 4,74,000/-. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case. No incriminating articles has been recovered from their possession. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner namely, Pintu Kumar has one criminal antecedent and petitioner namely, Amit Kumar has two criminal antecedents and they are in custody since 15.10.2025. The petitioners undertake to co-operate in the case/ trial. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners on the ground that petitioner namely, Pintu Kumar is the owner of the motorcycle which was used in commiting the crime and petitioner namely, Amit Kumar was his accomplice. 6. Considering the recovery of motorcycle used in committing crime from petitioner namely, Pintu Kumar and part of looted money and passbook etc. from petitioner namely, Amit Kumar, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, these applications stand dismissed. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T