[2026:RJ-JP:33787] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15926/2026 CNR: RJHC020762742026 | URN: CW / 33910U / 2026 1. Musharraf Hussain Gauri S/o Aseem Hussain, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 1-F-2, Vikas Nagar, Bundi, Rajasthan. 2. Anil Soni S/o Bhanwar Lal Soni, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Brahumpuri, Manohar Bavdi, Barunda House Ke Pass, Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak, Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak, Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Medical And Health Department, Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 21/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that the present writ petition be disposed in the light of the order dated 07.04.2026 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6182/2026, titled as 'Dr. Aman Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others'. The order dated 07.04.2026 reads as under :- [2026:RJ-JP:33787] (2 of 2) [CW-15926/2026] "1. With the consent of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is heard on final disposal. 2. The present writ petition has been filed being aggrieved of termination of the services of the petitioner, who is working on the post of Medical Officer on UTB basis. The petitioner's grievance is that the petitioner is being replaced by regular employees. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the case ofthe petitioner is squarely covered by the decision of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Dr. Amit Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4231/2025) passed on 01.04.2025. Operative portion of the order dated 01.04.2025 passed in the case of Dr. Amit Sharma (supra) reads as follows: "5. Considering the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners against the vacant posts (if any) in case, the respondents desire to take the services of the petitioner, till regularly selected candidates are available to them." 4. In view of the above cited order, the present writ petition isalso disposed of in the same terms as passed in the case of Dr. Amit Sharma (supra). 5. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of." 2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms, granting liberty to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners against the vacancy (if any), in case the respondents desire to take the services of the petitioner, till regularly selected candidates are available to them. 3. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J 6/VINAY