Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12091 (ALL)

YATENDRA SHARMA v. NARESH JOSHI AND 6 OTHERS

A227/14237/2026 · 2026-10-07

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14237 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(A) direct the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)/Fast Track Court, Ghaziabad to decide the application 176C dated 18.09.2024 filed by petitioner in Original Suit No. 969 of 2021 (Yatendra Sharma Versus Naresh Joshi and others) within stipulated period." 2. It is contended that an application has been moved for saving CCTV footage. The said application is pending consideration for the last two years. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the private respondents, at this stage, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon Court below to decide the application (Paper No.176-C) filed in Original Suit No.969 of 2021, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. October 8, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Kumar Verma, Sujeet Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Yatendra Sharma .....Petitioner(s) Naresh Joshi And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad