Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12090 (KAR)

T. HONNAIAH, v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/14400/2023 · 2026-03-25

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16890 WP No. 14400 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 14400 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. T. HONNAIAH, S/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKAMALIGE KOPPAL VILLAGE, KIRUGAVALU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 424 2. SRI. KRISHNAPPA K., S/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO.34/A, 3RD CROSS, E AND F BLOCK, NEAR CHURCH, RAMAKRISHNA NAGARA, MYSURU CITY-570 023 3. CHINNALU, S/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT NO.471, 9TH CROSS, VINAYA MARGA, SIDDARTHANAGARA, MYSURU CITY-570 011 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PUTEEREGOWDA, ADVOCATE- ABSENT) Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16890 WP No. 14400 of 2023 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT, CID, BANGALORE-560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MANJUNATH K., HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO- ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECT TO THE R-2 TO 4 GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATIONS OF THE R-3 AND 4. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16890 WP No. 14400 of 2023 ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is of the year 2023. On 10.08.2023, stay of notices was granted by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Learned HCGP submits that pursuant to the said notices, investigation is conducted and the charge sheet is also filed. On 23.03.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, the matter was directed to be listed on 24.03.2026. Even on 24.03.2026 also there was no representation and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption for ‘dismissal’. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57