IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16589 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2025 Thana- PURAINI District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1. Mangal Paswan Son of Budho Paswan @ Budhu paswan R/v - Ganeshpur Puraini, P.S - Puraini, District - Madhepura 2. Dhallo Paswan @ Dhalo son of Budho paswan @ Budhu Paswan R/v - Ganeshpur Puraini, P.S - Puraini, District - Madhepura 3. subodh Paswan Son of Budho Paswan @ Budhu Paswan R/v - Ganeshpur Puraini, P.S - Puraini, District - Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Pandey, Advocte : Mr. Dr Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 07-05-2026 Heard Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP representing the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Puraini P.S. Case No. 234 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., lodged on 19.11.2025 by the informant Shivnarayan Singh. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that he came to know that his son has been brutally injured and is in the hospital in critical condition, went to the said place and later the son succumbed to the injuries. The allegation is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16589 of 2026(3) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 that the named and unnamed accused suspecting him to be a thief, chose to beat him up the whole night resulting into his death. This led to the F.I.R. 4. In this case, the coordinate Bench had called for the case diary and during the investigation, it came to notice that the deceased was caught with the jewellery that was stolen by him, was tied to the pole and beaten the whole night. Beside the other accused, the names are there which include the petitioners. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts, it would be appropriate that the petitioners seek bail, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T