Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12082 (RAJ)

NANDLAL S/O KISHORE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/1680/2026 · 2026-08-20

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:33658] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1680/2026 CNR: RJHC020747212026 | URN: SOSA / 3006U / 2026 In S.B. Criminal Appeal No.1786/2026 Nandlal S/o Kishore, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Rajpur Bada, Tehsil Ramgarh Distt. Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p 2. Roshanlal S/o Shri Badri Prasad, Resident Of Rajpur Bada Tehsil Rajgarh Police Station Tehla Distt. Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hanish Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 20/08/2026 Instant application for suspension of sentence has been preferred on behalf of the applicant-appellant, to suspend the sentence awarded by the Court of learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Alwar (Raj.) vide its judgment dated 28.07.2026 in Sessions Case No.73/2016 (CIS No.83/2016), whereby the applicant-appellant was convicted for the alleged offence(s) & sentenced to undergo maximum period of one year simple imprisonment with fine. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant-appellant submits that the appellant was on bail during trial and the learned Trial Court has already suspended the sentence of the appellant [2026:RJ-JP:33658] (2 of 2) [SOSA-1680/2026] for a period of one month. Counsel further submits that the learned Trial Court has not appreciated the facts & circumstances of the case holistically and the hearing of the appeal will take its own time, hence, the sentence awarded to the applicant-appellant may be suspended during the pendency of the appeal. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the submissions made herein-above. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Looking to the overall facts & circumstances of the case and the submissions made at bar and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant-appellant during the pendency of the appeal. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is, hereby, ordered that the execution of sentence awarded to accused-applicant, namely Nandlal S/o Kishore, by the learned Trial Court shall remain suspended during pendency of the appeal, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 22.09.2026 and thereafter, as and when he is called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J 48/SAURABH