2026:JHHC:15137 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3766 of 2026 Torikul Sk @ Tarikul Rahman @ Tarikul, S/o- Iyasni Sk @ Yeasin Sk … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Md. Asadul Haque, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Saket Kumar, APP --- 03/15.05.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Pakur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 143 of 2025, registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118, 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 74, 352 and 351(2) of BNS, now pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Pakur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 28.03.2026 and the anticipatory bail has been granted to other co-accused, but the prayer for Anticipatory Bail of the petitioner was rejected. He submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and has submitted that as per the First Information Report itself, the petitioner is said to have assaulted the son of the informant by knife on his left hand and as per the injury report, the injury was grievous in nature. 5. Considering the direct allegation made against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. 6. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:15.05.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:16.05.2026