Jageesh kewal Chand Madhu v. The Assistant Commissioner (BRC for Export)
WP/7246/2026 · 2026-03-10
Mohammed Shaffiq
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12076 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12076 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 7246 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ WP No. 7246 of 2026 Jagdeesh Kewal Chand Madhu W/o Jagdeesh Bhati Proprietor of Sukhi Exporter (name changed to AAVAD EXIM) Office address S. No 5/2B, 231 A/2B1 Vignesh Ngar, Red Hills, Tiruvallur 600 052 ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Assistant Commissioner (BRC for Export) Office of the commissioner of Custom Chennai IV Ministry of the Finance, Department of Revenue, No 60, Rajaji slaai, Chennai Customs, Government of India, Chennai 600 001
2. The Deputy Commissioner (BRC section for export), Office of the commissioner of Custom Chennai IV Ministry of the Finance, Department of Revenue, No 60, Rajaji slaai, Chennai Customs, Government of India, Chennai 600 001 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 7246 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5
3. The Principal chief Commissioner of Custom Chennai zone, No 60, Rajaji salai, Chennai Customs, Government of India, Chennai 600 001 ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to provide certified true copy of order in original No 84223/ 2021 passed by Assistant Commissioner of Customs (Chennai IV) to the petitioner for purpose of appealing against the said impugned order. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Satish Kumar For Respondent(s): M/s. Anu Ganesan Standing Counsel
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, seeking a direction to the respondents to provide certified true copy of order in original No 84223/ 2021 passed by 1st respondent to petitioner for purpose of appealing against the said impugned order.
2. At the outset, learned Standing Counsel for respondents would submit that they may have no objection in providing the certified copy of the order-in- original No.84223/ 2021, however, she would submit that in the event of the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 7246 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 petitioner preferring an appeal, the question as to the date on which the impugned order was served shall be examined independently by the Appellate Authority.
3. In view of the above, the respondents shall provide the petitioner with the certified copy of the order-in-original No.84223/2021. It is made clear that in case the petitioner prefers to file an appeal, the date on which the impugned
order was served shall be examined independently by the Appellate Authority.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. 10-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ANU To
1. The Assistant Commissioner (BRC for Export) Office of the commissioner of Custom Chennai IV Ministry of the Finance, Department of Revenue, No 60, Rajaji slaai, Chennai Customs, Government of India, Chennai 600 001 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 7246 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5
2. The Deputy Commissioner (BRc ection for export), Office of the commissioner of Custom Chennai IV Ministry of the Finance, Department of Revenue, No 60, Rajaji slaai, Chennai Customs, Government of India, Chennai 600 001
3. The Principal chief Commisisoner of Custom hennai zone, No 60, Rajaji salai, Chennai Customs, Government of India, Chennai 600 001 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 7246 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. ANU WP No. 7246 of 2026 10-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis