BIPIN KUMAR SINGH ALIAS VIPIN KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4136/2026 · 2026-05-15
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12075 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12075 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(2026:JHHC:15121) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.4136 of 2026
------ Bipin Kumar Singh @ Vipin Kumar Singh son of Late Sanjan Singh, aged about 23 years, resident of village- Hatia Niche, P.O.- Hatia, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Ms. Monalisa Singh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 15-05-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hazaribagh Muffasil P.S. Case No.155 of 2025 (S.T. Case No. 27 of 2026) registered for the offences punishable under Section 310 (2) of the B.N.S.,
2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in dacoity and looted gold ornaments, precious stone watch. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case without holding any Test Identification Parade as the informant refused to take part in the Test Identification Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph-12 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.09.2025 as has been mentioned in para-05 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-I, Hazaribagh in connection with Hazaribagh Muffasil P.S. Case No.155 of 2025 (S.T. Case No. 27 of 2025) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 15/05/2026 Amar/