Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12072 (BOM)

RAJKUMAR REVANSIDHA BAMANE v. PUNE ZILLA PARISHAD YASHWANTRAO CHAVAN BHAVAN

WP/15504/2023 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30-WP-15503-2023.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 15503 OF 2023 Ashok Shrirang Godase ...Petitioner Versus Pune Zilla Parishad & Anr. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 15504 OF 2023 Rajkumar Revansidha Bamane ...Petitioner Versus Pune Zilla Parishad & Anr. ...Respondents _______ Mr. Shubham Misar for Petitioner in WP/15503/2023. Mr. Yatin Malvankar for Petitioner in WP/15504/2023. Mr. Ashwin R. Kapadnis for Respondent No.1. _______ CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE: 28th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C. 1. By these petitions, the Petitioners have assailed the Order dated 29th November 2023, whereby the Petitioners were suspended by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Pune, in contemplation of departmental enquiry. 2. Learned counsel for Respondent No.1 has placed on record the Order dated 28th November 2025, whereby the Petitioners have been exonerated in the departmental enquiry and the period of suspension has been directed to be treated as a period on duty. The Order dated 28th November 2025 passed by the Disciplinary Authority / Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Pune, is taken on record. Ajit Pathrikar AJIT RAMESH PATHRIKAR Digitally signed by AJIT RAMESH PATHRIKAR Date: 2026.09.29 14:44:41 +0530 30-WP-15503-2023.DOC 3. In this view of the matter, further adjudication of these petitions is not called for. The petitions are accordingly disposed of. No costs. 4. Necessary entries regarding the exoneration of the Petitioners and treating the period of suspension as a period on duty be made in the respective service books of the Petitioners. (DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Ajit Pathrikar