Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12067 (DEL)

AARTI TANDON v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(C)/9232/2026 · 2026-07-13

Amit Bansal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 9232/2026 $~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9232/2026 AARTI TANDON .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishabh Kant Sharma, Advocate versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Standing Counsel for R-1/MCD Mr. Vinod Dahiya, Mr. Dhruv Khurana, Ms. Shreya Garg, Mr. Bhaskar Dongwal and Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocates for R-2 and R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 13.07.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no.1/MCD to take action against unauthorised construction being carried out by respondents no.2 and 3 in the property bearing no.74-C, AP Block, Pitampura, New Delhi – 110034 (‘subject property’). 2. Ms. Saroj Bidawat, counsel appearing on advance notice on behalf of MCD submits that the subject property has been booked by the respondent no.1/MCD and a speaking order dated 5th June, 2026 has been passed for demolition of the unauthorised construction. However, it is submitted that the private respondents no.2 and 3 have filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD (ATMCD) along with an interim application for stay which This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 12:09:36 W.P.(C) 9232/2026 is now listed before the ATMCD on 29th July, 2026. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no.2 and 3 submits that the said respondents had filed a writ petition before this Court alleging unauthorised construction by the petitioner and the present writ petition is in the nature of the counterblast to the said writ petition. 4. To be noted, the present writ petition was filed on 12th May, 2026 and there is no reference to the earlier writ petition filed by the respondents against the petitioner’s property which was listed before this Court on 2nd April, 2026 and the petitioner herein was represented by counsel on the said date. 5. Taking note of the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the matter is now sub-judice before ATMCD, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present writ petition. 6. Needless to state that the respondent no.1/MCD shall take appropriate action based on the outcome of the proceedings before ATMCD. AMIT BANSAL, J JULY 13, 2026 ds This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 12:09:36