Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12065 (JHR)

AMIR RASHID ALIAS MD AAMIR RASHID ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2257/2026 · 2026-05-06

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:13602 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2257 of 2026 ------ 1. Amir Rashid @ Md. Aamir Rashid Ansari, son of Late Harun Rashid, resident of Kumharpara, Dumka, P.O. and P.S. Dumka, District Dumka 2. Akram Khan @ Md. Akram, son of Md. Yamran, resident of New Dangal Para, Dumka, P.O. and P.S. Dumka, District Dumka, Jharkhand 3. Sahabaj Khan @ Md. Sharbaj Khan @ Md. Shahbaj Khan, son of Nehal Khan, resident of Sriamra, Dumka, P.O. and P.S. Dumka, District Dumka .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Durga C. Mishra, Advocate For the State : Ms. Bandana Sinha, A.P.P. ------ 02/06.05.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dumka (M) PS Case No.86 of 2025, for offence registered under section 308(2), 189(1), 115(2) and 117(2) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dumka. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and the allegation is there against the petitioners and other co-accused persons of demanding Rangdari for taking liquor and the allegations against all accused persons are there of assaulting by fists, legs and chair. He next submits that co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 748 of 2026. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of assault against all the accused persons including the petitioner. 5. Looking to the contents of the FIR, it transpires that the allegations are there against the petitioners, who came along with other co-accused and forcibly demanded Rangdari for taking liquor and the allegations are against all accused persons of assaulting by fists, legs and chair, but the injury is said to be simple and further no amount of Rangdari is mentioned, and co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail 2026:JHHC:13602 in the aforesaid A.B.A and in that view of the matter, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dumka, in connection with Dumka (M) PS Case No.86 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 08.05.2026