Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12060 (GAU)

BISHU RONGPI AND 2 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./1883/2026 · 2026-08-17

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010140642026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1883/2026 BISHU RONGPI AND 2 ORS. S/O LT. PADAM RONGPI, RESIDENT OF H/NO-35, SAMTARO GAON, SIKHARIGATE, P.S.- BOKOLIA, DISTRICT-KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM. 2: RANGSINA RONGHANG S/O LT. ANESWAR RONGHANG RESIDENT OF LOKHON TERANG GAON NEAR BURAGOHAIN LP SCHOOL P.S.- DOKMOKA DISTRICTKARBI ANGLONG ASSAM. 3: MUNU RONGPI S/O BISHU RONGPI RESIDENT OF H/NO-35 SAMTARO GAON SIKHARIGATE P.S.- BOKOLIA DISTRICTKARBI ANGLONG ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. T SOM, MS P DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 18.08.2026 Page No.# 2/2 Heard Ms. T. Som, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. M. P. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent. 2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioners, namely, (1) Bishu Rongpi (2) Rangsina Ronghang (3) Munu Rongpi, praying for grant of bail in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No.223/2026 under Sections 303(2)/325 of the BNS Read With Sections 11(1)(a)/11(1)(d) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. 3. The petitioners were allowed an interim protection by the order dated 15/7/2026. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that materials have been collected against the petitioner. 5. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioners were in custody from 28/6/2026 till the time they were granted an interim protection and also that the investigation has further progressed, I am of the opinion that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners at this stage may not be necessary. 6. Accordingly, the interim protection granted on 15/7/2026 is made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioners continue to participate and co-operate in the investigation process as and when required by the Investigating Authority. 6. Accordingly, this bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant