M/S SHRIRAM MASALA UDYOG v. SMT SUSHILA DEVI W/O RAKESH KUMAR
WRES/302/2026 · 2026-08-20
Sudesh Bansal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12058 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12058 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:33640] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 302/2025 In S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.962/2024 CNR: RJHC020618842025 | URN: CRES / 610U / 2025 Union of India, Through General Manager, North Western Railway, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1 Hanuman Singh Bhati S/o Shri Sonaram, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Near Radha Krishna Temple, Madhuvan Mohalla, Pipal City, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan). 2 Smt. Vidha Devi W/o Shri Hanuman Singh Bhati, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Near Radha Krishna Temple, Madhuvan Mohalla, Pipal City, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Balwada For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 20/08/2026
1. Instant restoration application has been filed by and on behalf of Union of India seeking to restore the S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.962/2024.
2. It has been submitted that appeal was filed challenging the award dated 11.12.2023 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Jaipur.
3. Since the compensation amount has already been disbursed, hence, appeal itself has become infructuous, in that view,
[2026:RJ-JP:33640] (2 of 2) [CRES-302/2025] applicant-appellant does not want to pursue the appeal on merit and there is no purpose to continue this restoration application.
4. Accordingly, the restoration application is dismissed as not press.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J 29/NITIN