Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12055 (BOM)

DR. BALKRISHNA RAGHUNATH SHETE v. DR. TANAJI RAJARAM KADAM AND ANR

REVN/57/2017 · 2026-09-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

11-REVN-57-2017-(CR).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 57 OF 2017 Dr. Balkrishna Raghunath Shete … Applicant V/s. Dr. Tanaji Rajaram Kadam And Anr … Respondents WITH CR. APPLICATION IN REVISION NO. 51 OF 2017 IN CR. REVISION APPLICATION NO. 57 OF 2017 Dr. Balkrishna Raghunath Shete … Applicant V/s. Dr. Tanaji Rajaram Kadam And Anr … Respondents Mr. Mohan M. Chavan i/b. Mr. Rajaram Bansode, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Tejas Patil i/b. Vishwanath Talkute, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 24, 2026 P.C.: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant/accused has expired and, therefore, the Revision Application has become infructuous. He seeks leave to withdraw the same. 2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The Revision Application 1/2 adn 11-REVN-57-2017-(CR).docx stands disposed of as infructuous. 3. In sequel, the Interim Application, if any, also stands disposed of. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) 2/2 adn