1 2026:CGHC:8202 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1796 of 2025 1. Bharatlal Yadav S/o Shri Parauram Yadav, Aged About 44 Years R/o Kesda, Thana Simga, District Balodabazar, Chhattisgarh 2. Dhaneshwar Verma S/o Shri Vishram Verma Aged About 55 Years R/o Madhi Chwok, Silyari, Thana Dharsiwa, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 3. Smt. Rupoutin Bai S/o Late Nema Kumar Nishad Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Deori, Thana Neora, Tahsil Neora, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.1 - Bhagwati Kumar Nishad S/o Late Nema Kumar Nishad Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Deori, Thana Neora, Tahsil Neora, Dist. Raipur C.G. 3.2 - Santosh Kumar Nishad S/o Late Nema Kumar Nishad Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Deori, Thana Neora, Tahsil Neora, Dist. Raipur C.G. 3.3 - Bhagirathi Nishad S/o Late Nema Kumar Nishad Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Deori, Thana Neora, Tahsil Neora, Dist. Raipur C.G. 3.4 - Shiv Kumar Nishad S/o Late Nema Kumar Nishad Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Deori, Thana Neora, Tahsil Neora, Dist. Raipur C.G. 4. Babulal Sinha S/o Shri Khorbahra Sinha Aged About 42 Years R/o Banbhimori, Thana Tilda Neora, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5. Omprakash Verma S/o Shri Sahdeoram Verma, Aged About 44 Years R/o Khamariya Thana Neora, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6. Revaram Dhimar S/o Shri Ramuram Dhimar, Aged About 42 Years R/o Bhimori, Thana Tilda, Dist. Raipur (C.G.) SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.02.16 11:02:45 +0530 2 ... Petitioners versus 1. Shri S.K. Tikam Chief Engineer, Jal Sansadhan Vibhag Sinchai Bhavan, Civil Lines, Raipur, Dist. Raipur C.G. 2. Shri Girish Tikariya, Executive Engineer, Bhatapara Nahar Nirman Sambhag 3, Tilda, Dist. Raipur C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioners : None. For Respondents : Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Gauraha, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order On Board 13/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for respondents submits that this contempt petition is filed alleging that the order dated 13.2.2025 passed in WPL No.178/2017 has not been complied with. He submits that subsequent to filing of contempt petition, respondents have deposited a sum of Rs.2 Lakh in the account of each petitioners and copy of proceeding in this regard is placed on record as Annexure R-1, which are at Page No.8 of reply filed on behalf of respondents. 2. In view of above submission of learned counsel for respondents, this contempt proceeding is dropped and contempt notice stands discharged. 3. The contempt petition is closed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/- 3