APHC010102542020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6266/2020 Between: 1. Y.M.AKTHAR KHATUN, , W/O. SYED GHOUSE, AGED 48 YRS, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO. 20-22678, MARUTHI NAGAR, KORLAGUNTA, TIRUPATI CITY, TIRUPATI URBAN DISTRICT, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPT., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN DISTRICT, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MAHILA POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, OFFICE AT EAST POLICE STATION COMPOUND. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, M.R.PALLI P.S., TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , TIRUPATI EAST P.S., TIRUPATI. 6. M DEVIKA, , W/O. M. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED 40 YRS, DR. NO. 19-8-210/E, HATHIRAMJI COLONY, BAIRAGIPATTEDA, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. K JAGANNADHAM REDDY, , S/O.K. SUBHAS, AGED 28 YRS, DR. NO. 19-8-210/E, HATHIRAMJI COLONY, BAIRAGIPATTEDA, 2 TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. K SUDHIKAR REDDY, S/O.K.JAGANNADHA REDDY, AGED 35 YRS, R/O. DR. NO. 19-8-210/E, HATHIRAMJI COLONY, BAIRAGIPATTEDA, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. M DHANUNJAYA REDDY, , S/O. NAGA SUBBA REDDY, AGED 32 YRS, R/O. DR. NO. 19-8-210/E, HATHIRAMJI COLONY, BAIRAGIPATTEDA, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 10. K SUBHASH, , S/O. K. JAGANNADHA REDDY, AGED 31 YRS, R/O. DR. NO. 19-8-210/E, HATHIRAMJI COLONY, BAIRAGIPATTEDA, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 11. M ANIL KUMAR REDDY, , S/O. M. RAJA REDDY, AGED 24 YRS, R/O. DR. NO. 19-8-210/E, HATHIRAMJI COLONY, BAIRAGIPATTEDA, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an approriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 in not initiating action against Respondent Nos. 6 to 11 basing on the complaint submitted to Respondent No.2 by the Petitioner, dt. 24-2-2020 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles of natural justice and opposed to Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to take action against the Respondents 6 to 11 basing on the complaint dated 24-2-2020 submitted by the Petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent. No.2 to take action against Respondents 6 to 11 basing on the complaint' dt. 24-2-2020 given by the Petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B PARAMESEWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6266/2020 ORDER: 1. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. On 29.07.2026 and 23.09.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the petition. 2. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J Date: 08.10.2026 SSA 4 15 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6266/2020 Date: 08.10.2026 SSA