Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12031 (GAU)

M/S DULAL DUTTA v. RATI KANTA PEGU

Cont.Cas(C)/165/2026 · 2026-08-11

Devashis Baruah

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010048462026 2026:GAU-AS:11428 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/165/2026 M/S DULAL DUTTA A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR MR. DULAL DUTTA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O AMAR CHANDRA DUTTA, R/O VILL.- BORBIL, P.O.- DIGBOI, PIN- 786171 IN THE DISTRICT OF TINSUKIA, ASSAM. VERSUS RATI KANTA PEGU CHIEF ENGINEER, PWD (BORDER ROADS AND NEC WORKS), ASSAM, CHANDMARI, GUWAHATI- 781003, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. B. Gohain, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Gogoi, SC, PWD BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 12.08.2026 It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner that the Petitioner has already received Page No.# 2/2 the amount of security deposit to the tune of Rs.37,25,280/-. As regards the question of interest, the Petitioner has already given an undertaking that the Petitioner would not claim the same. Mr. B. Gogoi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent has placed the said documents which are kept on record and marked with the letter “Y”. 2. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings stands dropped. JUDGE Comparing Assistant