Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12031 (CHH)

MURARI YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6150/2023 · 2026-02-23

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:9725 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6150 of 2023 1 - Murari Yadav S/o Late Chhoteram Yadav Aged About 61 Years Resident Of Dhangar Dipa, Shankar Nagar, Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Higher Education, Technical Education, Science And Technology Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Director Kirodimal Institute Of Technology, Gadhumariya - Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.). 3 - The Principal Kirodimal Institute Of Technology, Gadhumariya - Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.). 4 - The Labour Commissioner Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.). 5 - The Collector Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ujjawal Choubey, Panel Lawyer. For Respondents No. 2 & 3 : Mr. Shubham Singh, Advocate on RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 behalf of Mr. Ravi Ranjan Sinha, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/02/2026 1. None appears for the petitioner to argue the case even in second round, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat