Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12030 (CHH)

RAM GOPAL SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3630/2026 · 2026-04-26

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19288 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3630 of 2026 1 - Ram Gopal Sahu S/o Shri Raghuveer Sahu Aged About 37 Years Posted As Patwari, P.H. No. 26, Jepra, Tahsil- Charama, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) R/o Village- Mudkhusra, Post- Anwari, Tahsil- Charama, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner Bastar Division, District- Bastar (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Kanker, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 4 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Charama, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 5 - The Tahsildar Tahsil- Charama, District- North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 6 - The Commissioner (Land Records) Chhattisgarh Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Vivek Verma, Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 27 /04/2026 2 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the petitioner’s case for its kind perusal. 10.2 that, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature mandamus quashing the impugned punishment order dated 23.11.2020 passed by Respondent No. 4 (Annexure P/1). 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to grant the consequential benefits after quashing the said punishment order. 10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief/relief’s in favour of the petitioner, which the Hon’ble Court deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file appeal against the impugned order dated 23.11.2020 (Annexure P/1). 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY