948-IA(L)-26186-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS SUIT NO.289 OF 2026 Bisleri International Private Limited ...Plaintiff Versus Nitesh Baderiya ...Defendant WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.26186 OF 2026 IN COMMERCIAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS SUIT NO.289 OF 2026 Bisleri International Private Limited ...Applicant In The Matter Between Bisleri International Private Limited ...Plaintiff Versus Nitesh Baderiya ...Defendant WITH LEAVE PETITION NO.250 OF 2026 IN COMMERCIAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS SUIT NO.289 OF 2026 Bisleri International Private Limited ...Petitioner Versus Nitesh Baderiya ...Respondent —————— Ms. Aishwarya M. Lad a/w Deepu Gupta i/b Vinod A. Bhagat, for the Plaintiff. Mr. Rahul Punjabi a/w Vaishnavi Bansfore, for the Defendant. Mr. Nitesh Baderiya, Defendant, present through Video Conferencing. Mr. Shashank Parmar, present through Video Conferencing. —————— Arjun 1 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2026.09.29 13:19:03 +0530 948-IA(L)-26186-2026.doc Coram: Madhav J. Jamdar, J. Date: September 24, 2026 P.C.: 1. Heard Ms. Lad, learned Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff and Mr. Punjabi, learned Counsel appearing for the Defendant. LEAVE PETITION NO.250 OF 2026 2. Perused the Plaint and the Leave Petition. 3. For the reasons set out in Leave Petition No.250 of 2026, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). COMMERCIAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS SUIT NO.289 OF 2026 4. Ms. Lad, learned Counsel appearing for the Plaintiff and Mr. Punjabi, learned Counsel appearing for the Defendant state that the parties have settled the dispute and tenders the ‘Consent Terms’. 5. The Consent Terms are signed by Mr. Shashank Parmar, Authorized Representative of the Plaintiff, who has been authorized to sign the Consent Terms by Board Resolution of the Plaintiff dated 27th February 2023. The Consent Terms are also signed by the Defendant-Mr. Nitesh Baderiya, who is the Proprietor, doing business under the name and style “Maa Gayatri Aqua Minerals”. 6. Both Mr. Shashank Parmar, Authorized Representative of the Plaintiff and Mr. Nitesh Baderiya (Defendant), the Proprietor of said Arjun 2 948-IA(L)-26186-2026.doc Maa Gayatri Aqua Minerals are present through Video Conferencing. Both of them state that the Plaintiff and the Defendant have settled the dispute in terms of the Consent Terms and that the Consent Terms are signed by them. The Consent Terms are also signed by the respective Advocates, who identify the signatures of the respective parties. 7. Accordingly, the Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The Consent Terms read as under: Arjun 3 948-IA(L)-26186-2026.doc Arjun 4 948-IA(L)-26186-2026.doc Arjun 5 948-IA(L)-26186-2026.doc Arjun 6 948-IA(L)-26186-2026.doc Arjun 7 948-IA(L)-26186-2026.doc Arjun 8 948-IA(L)-26186-2026.doc Arjun 9 948-IA(L)-26186-2026.doc Arjun 10 948-IA(L)-26186-2026.doc Various statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings given to the Court. 8. Accordingly, Commercial Intellectual Property Rights Suit No.289 of 2026 is decreed in terms of the Consent Terms. 9. Refund of Court fees as per rules. 10. In view of disposal of Commercial Intellectual Property Rights Suit No.289 of 2026, nothing survives in Interim Application (L) No.26186 of 2026 and the same is also disposed of. [Madhav J. Jamdar, J.] Arjun 11