Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1202 (CAL)

MAHAMMAD SAMIRUDDIN @ SAMIRUDDIN SK @ MD. SAMIRUDDIN AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/41/2026 · 2026-02-10

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.02.2026 Sl. no. 43 Ct. No. 42 P.M. CRR 41 OF 2026 Mahammad Samiruddin @ Samiruddin Sk @ Md. Samiruddin & Ors. - Vs – The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay, Mr. Suman Sankar Chatterjee, Ms. Sadia Parveen ... for the petitioners 1. During the course of submission learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to move the application before the learned Trial Court for pre-ponement of the case. 2. Learned counsel also seeks liberty to file an application for discharge of the accused persons. 3. Liberty is granted. 4. Let the learned Trial Court dispose of the discharge application expeditiously in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournment. 5. All the contentions are left open. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case and no expression made herein shall tantamount to be in expression on the merits of the case. 7. This petition is disposed of. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all usual requisite formalities.. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)