- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11690 MFA No. 2157 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2157 OF 2022 (CPC) BETWEEN: SMT GOWRAMMA W/O MOTAIAH D/O SAMPANGIREDDY AND CHELUVAMMA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.35, 8TH CROSS, MARUTHINAGARA, HEROHALLI, MAHADESHWARANAGARA MAIN ROAD, VISHWANEEDAM POST, BENGALURU-560091. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. M RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT CHELUVAMMA W/O LATE SAMPANGIREDDY AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, NO.124, PRASANNA LAYOUT, MAHADESHWARANAGARA MAIN ROAD, HEROHALLI, VISHWANEEDAM POST BENGALURU-560091. 2. SMT VENKATALAXMAMMA @ LAKSHMAMMA W/O T VENKATESHA D/O SAMPANGIREDDY AND CHELUVAMMA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, NO.124, PRASANNA LAYOUT, MAHADESHWARANAGARA MAIN ROAD, HEROHALLI, VISHWANEEDAM POST, BENGALURU-560091. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11690 MFA No. 2157 of 2022 3. SMT SHASHIKALA W/O KRISHNAPPA D/O SAMPANGIREDDY AND CHELUVAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT BIDADI, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-572109. 4. SMT PREMA, W/O K R MAHESHA D/O SAMPANGIREDDY AND CHELUVAMMA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT AGRAHARA, 3RD CROSS, BEHIND POLICE STATION, KUNIGAL TOWN AND TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572130. 5. SMT PUSHPALATHA W/O H S KRISHNAPPA D/O SAMPANGIREDDY AND CHELUVAMMA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NO.4, PRASANNA LAYOUT, 1ST CROSS, NILAGIRITHOPU MAIN ROAD, HEROHALLI, VISHWANEEDAM POST, BENGALURU-560091. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ABHISHEK N.V., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1, R2 AND R5) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) READ WITH SECTION 104 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11690 MFA No. 2157 of 2022 ORAL JUDGMENT The appeal is filed to set aside the order dated:02.08.2021 passed by the Court of V Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru on I.A.No.1 in O.S.No.1386/2020. 2. The Registry concerned has furnished the E-court status of O.S.No.1386/2020. A perusal of the same depicts that the suit has been disposed on 02.02.2026. Because of disposal of the main suit itself, the appeal does not survives for consideration. 3. Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39