Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12018 (PNJ)

IMRAN KHAN v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/15173/2026 · 2026-04-16

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

214 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IMRAN KHAN STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Sukhmeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) Learned State counsel has produced a custody certificate and status report by way of an affidavit of Onkar Singh Brar, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Nakodar, Jalandhar, respondent-State, Mr. Prateek respondent No.2 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 16.04.2026 himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH IMRAN KHAN VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Sukhmeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) Learned State counsel has produced a custody certificate and status report by way of an affidavit of Onkar Singh Brar, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Nakodar, Jalandhar, State, which are taken on record. Mr. Prateek Pandit, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of and has filed Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-15173-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 16.04.2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Sukhmeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Learned State counsel has produced a custody certificate and status report by way of an affidavit of Onkar Singh Brar, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Nakodar, Jalandhar, has been filed on behalf of , Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of , which is taken on record. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE Learned State counsel has produced a custody certificate and status report by way of an affidavit of Onkar Singh Brar, PPS, Deputy Superintendent has been filed on behalf of , Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be HIMANSHU 2026.04.16 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document