1 2026:CGHC:7367 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 10314 of 2025 • Sachin Nalge S/o Lt. Adhik Appa Nalge Aged About 38 Years R/o Shri J Apartment, House No.- B/10, Police Station Shahpuri, District- Satara Maharashtra (Note Corrected Name And Address As Per Documents In Page No. 16 Of The Application) --- Applicant versus • State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Cyber Police Thana Range, District Durg (Corrected As Per Fir At Page No. 25) --- Respondent MCRC No. 113 of 2026 • Hemant Kushwaha S/o Sikandar @ Bhagwan Das Kushwaha Aged About 20 Years R/o House No. 267, Ward No. 13, Middle School Ke Samne, Taronkala, Nalghar Ke Pas, Station Road, Pipariya, Ram Nagar Colony, Narmadapuram, District Narmadapuram M.P. (Sikandar And Tamghar Are Wrongly Mentioned In Order Dated 04-11-2025) ---Applicant Versus • State of Chhattisgarh Through Thana Incharge, Cyber Thana Range Durg, District Durg C.G. --- Respondent (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicants Mr. Dinesh Naik and Mr. Rajendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For Respondent/State Ms. Anusha Naik, Dy.G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 10/02/2026 1. Since above-mentioned two first bail applications arise out of same incident, same crime number and registered at same police station, they VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2026.02.12 11:01:42 +0530 2 are clubbed and heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The applicants have preferred this bail applications under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for grant of regular bail, to the applicants who have been arrested in connection with Crime No.04/2025 registered at Police Station – Cyber Thana Range District – Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 336(1), 317(4) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (for short BNS), 2023 and Section 66 D of Information Technology Act, 2000. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants submit that the trial has already been concluded and today the matter was fixed for pronouncement of judgment, however, the same has been adjourned. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants, particularly considering the fact that the trial has already been concluded by the trial Court and the judgment was to be pronounced today itself, but the same was adjourned, without entering into the merits of the case, the present bail applications are hereby rejected. 5. Officer is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaishali