SMT. MINA BARLE v. CHHATTISGARH INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
WPS/859/2020 · 2026-01-12
Shri Sanjay K Agrawal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12015 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12015 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:1941
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 859 of 2020 Smt. Mina Barle W/o Late Shri Rajdeo Barle Aged About 49 Years R/o Mowa-Kanpa, Near Shukla Kirana, Kanpa, Raipur, Police Station - Mowa, District -Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation Through - Managing Director Old Police Head Quarter Premises, Rajbhawan Road, Raipur, District Raipur,chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Divisional Manager Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation, Division Office, Old Police Head Quarter Premises, Rajbhawan Road, Raipur, District - Raipur,chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner
: Mr. Lav Sharma, Advocate on behalf For Respondents : Mr. Anup Majumdar, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 13.01.2026
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of petitioner’s grievance, he may be permitted to file a comprehensive representation alongwith supportive documents before the concerned SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN
2 respondents authorities, which may be directed to be considered and decided within a reasonable time.
3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is permitted to file aforesaid representation alongwith copy of this order and supportive documents before the concerned respondents within 04 weeks’ from today and, in turn, the concerned respondent is directed to consider and decide petitioners’ said representation in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order preferably within 06 weeks from the date of receipt of said representation.
4. With aforesaid observation and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No cost. Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge s@if