Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12013 (DEL)

BHUSHAN & ANR. v. THE STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR.

CRL.M.C./3838/2026 · 2026-07-13

Madhu Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3838/2026 &CRL.M.A. 15481/2026, CRL.M.A. 15554/2026 BHUSHAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vinod Gehlot and Mr. Gajendra Singh, Advs. along with petitioners in person versus THE STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP SI Pankaj Kumar, PS Bhajanpura Mr. Rahul Singh, Adv. for R2 R2 in person (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R % 13.07.2026 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. By the way of the present petition the petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No. 006/2020, registered at Police Station Bhajanpura, for the offences punishable under Sections 323/341/354/506/34 of Indian Penal Code,1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’), and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the parties. 3. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. 4. The petitioners and respondents no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer. 5. On 29.12.2019, an altercation allegedly took place between the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/07/2026 at 11:23:54 complainant and the petitioners, during which the petitioners are alleged to have abused, threatened, and misbehaved with the complainant. Pursuant thereto, the present FIR against the petitioners. On 02.02.2026, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), whereby they agreed to cooperate and support each other in seeking quashing of the cross FIRs registered against them. 6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for quashing of the FIR and submits that the allegations levelled in the FIR are serious in nature. He further submits that the present case arises out of cross-FIRs and, therefore, ought not to be quashed. 7. On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the IO, has categorically stated that she has entered into a compromise vide MoU dated 02.02.2026 out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, she has no objection, if the present FIR is quashed. 8. In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 9. Accordingly, FIR No. 006/2020 registered at Police Station Bhajanpura, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 323/341/354/506/34 of the IPC along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, is hereby quashed. 10. The present petition is disposed of. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/07/2026 at 11:23:54 11. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J JULY 13, 2026/ys/rm This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/07/2026 at 11:23:54