ADITYA KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
HABC/1379/2026 · 2026-10-06
Deepak Verma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12010 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12010 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 1379 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. Petitioners' counsel submits that corpus-petitioner no.2 is aged about 18 years and petitioner no.1 is aged about 19 years. He has placed reliance over the bail order, in that order it has been considered that petitioner no.1 and corpus have solemnized marriage. The petition is not supported by any marriage certificate. Corpus-petitioner no.2 is living with her mother and she is present in the Court with her mother. Petitioner no.1 is 19 years of age and has not attained the age of marriage. As per High School Marksheet, annexed as Annexure 4 to the affidavit, victim/corpus is major and she stated before the Court that she wants to live with petitioner no.1. Since, the corpus-petitioner no.2 has attained the age of majority, as such, she has right to live as per her own wish, as such, corpus is free to go either with petitioner no.1 or respondent no.4. Corpus has not illegally detained, as she is living with her parents. In view of the aforesaid, since this Court does not find detention of corpus is illegal, as such, present petition is accordingly, disposed off. October 7, 2026 Nitin Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deeksha Gupta, Siddharth Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Deepak Verma,J.) Aditya Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad