NASIM KHAN @ JABBAR @ SAMSER ALAM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1554/2026 · 2026-05-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12007 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 12007 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:13615 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 1554 of 2026
------ Nasim Khan @ Jabbar @ Samser Alam, aged about 52 years, s/o late Kasim Khan, r/o Hanuman Mandir Jyoti Park Gali Number 13, Gurgaon, P.O. & P.S.-Gurgaon, Dist.-Gurgaon, Haryana
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Himanshu S. Pandey, Advocate
: Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State
: Mrs. Lily Sahay, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.05 Dated- 07.05.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Hansdiha P.S. Case No.71 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed dacoity and looted Rs.18,96,565/-from a bank. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and even though the petitioner is not named in the FIR, without putting the petitioner to T.I. Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph no.03 of the supplementary affidavit dated 16.04.2026; charge sheet has been submitted against him in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been identified on the basis of the CCTV footage by the spy. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.10.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 11 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by a coordinate Bench
of this Court vide order dated 06.10.2025 in B.A. No.3671 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dumka, in connection with Hansdiha P.S. Case No.71 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
07.05.2026 Gunjan-