Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010169662026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/827/2026 SMTI BABITA BHATTARAI WIFE OF SRI TEK BHATTARAI, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.57, BIBEK PATH, LATAKATA ROAD, BASISTHA CHARIALI P.O.- BASISTHA, P.S.-BASISTHA, GUWAHATI781028, KAMRUP M, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY PP ASSAM 2:SRI TEK BHATTARAI SON OF LATE NETRA BAHADUR BHATTARAI RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.57 BIBEK PATH LATAKATA ROAD BASISTHA CHARIALI P.O.-BASISTHA P.S.-BASISTHA GUWAHATI-781028 KAMRUP M ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A RAHMAN, MD IMRAN,MS F HUSSAIN,MR S M ABDULLAH P Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. S KANUNGOE Linked Case : Crl.Rev.P./349/2024 TEK BHATTARAI S/O LATE NETRA BAHADUR BHATTARAI R/O HOUSE NO. 57 Page No.# 2/3 BIBEK PATH LATAKATA ROAD BASISTHA CHARIALI P.O. BSISTHA P.S. BASISTHA GUWAHATI-781028 KAMRUP (M) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM 2:SMT. BABITA BHATTARAI W/O SRI TEK BHATTARAI R/O HOUSE NO. 57 BIBEK PATH LATAKATA ROAD BASISTHA CHARIALI P.O. BASISTHA P.S. BASISTHA GUWAHATI-781028 KAMRUP (M) ------------ Advocate for : MS. S KANUNGOE Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 13. 08.2026 Heard Ms. F. Hussain, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. R.J. Baruah, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. This I.A. has been filed on behalf of the applicant, seeking correction of certain errors that has been crept in the order dated 27.07.2026, passed by this Court in Crl. Revision Page No.# 3/3 Petition No. 349 of 2024. It is stated that in paragaraph Nos. 9, 11, and 12 of the order dated 27.07.2026, passed by this Court in Crl. Revision Petition No. 349 of 2024 instead of Rs. 4,000/- the amount of Rs. 6,500/- should be recorded. Upon perusal of the records, it appears that the figure has been erroneously mentioned Rs. 4,000/- which is required to be corrected by recording Rs. 6,500/- in the aforesaid paragaraphs. Accordingly, it is directed that the figure Rs. 4,000/- appearing in paragraph Nos. 9, 11, and 12 of the order dated 27.07.2026, passed by this Court in Crl. Revision Petition No. 349 of 2024 should be read as Rs.6,500/- This order shall be a part of the order dated 27.07.2026, passed by this Court in Crl. Revision Petition No. 349 of 2024. The I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant