1 HN, J C.C.No.3509_2025 APHC010613952025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3509/2025 Between: 1. K VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O.VEERABHADRA RAO, AGE. 65 YEARS, KAKINADA ,R/O 57.9.27, TILLAPUDIWARI LANE JAGANADHAPURAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI S SURESH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBUN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. 2. SRI N V V SATYANARAYANA, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT. R 2 CAUSE TITLE AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 27.02.2026, VIDE IA NO- 1/2025 IN CC NO 3509 OF 2025 3. SRI S MASTYARAJU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLAIMING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt.02.09.2025 of this Honble Court made in WP. No.29008/2024 and pass 2 HN, J C.C.No.3509_2025 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Amend the Cause Title in the present Contempt case by Deleting the Respondent No.2 Sri S Sachidananda Varma ( S S Varma), Commissioner, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada District and Amend Respondent 2 as Sri N VV Satyanarayana, Commissioner, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada in the above C.C.No.3509 of 2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. M Krishna Rao SC for skl vzm kkd Municipal Corporations 2. 3 HN, J C.C.No.3509_2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner(s), nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:30.09.2026 NKA 4 HN, J C.C.No.3509_2025 11 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3509 of 2025 Date: 30.09.2026 NKA