Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 12 (HP)

MINAKSHI THAKUR v. GOPAL BERI

COPC/130/2026 · 2026-03-25

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 ( 2026:HHC:8886 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.130 of 2026 Date of Decision: 25.03.2026 ___________________________________________________ Minakshi Thakur ....Petitioner Versus Dr. Gopal Beri …Respondent ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : None. For the respondent : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated 24.03.2026, alongwith copy of office order dated 24.03.2026, wherein it has been stated as under:- “It is submitted that pursuant to the directions passed by the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 02.01.2026 in CWP No.20827/2025 as well as directions/decision conveyed by the Government on the issue from time to time, the petitioner has presently been allowed the benefit of higher pay stage in the concerned level of pay matrix i.e. Rs. 31,200/- vide Office Order dated 23.03.2026, copy enclosed as Flag-A, however, subject to availability of further legal remedies, if any required. Hence, the judgment under reference stood complied with by the respondents in the matter.” 1. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:8886 ) 2. Since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, despite repeated calls and as per the aforesaid instructions dated 24.03.2026, as the judgment under reference stood complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the matter is closed. ( Sushil Kukreja ) March 25, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)