Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11997 (JHR)

TAUKIR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4166/2026 · 2026-05-15

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:15220] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4166 of 2026 ------ Taukir Ansari, Son of Irfan Ansari aged about – 26 years, Resident of Village Pandri P.O. & P.S. Chanho District- Ranchi .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Md. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-15-05-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chanho P.S. Case No.32 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 126 (2), 115 (2), 118 (1), 117 (2), 109, 352, 351 (3), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder Sehbaz Ansari by assaulting him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-05 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the main allegation is against the co-accused Sohail Ansari who hit the head of the victim with a pair of scissors which struck inside the head of the victim. It is also submitted that there is no direct and specific allegation against the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.03.2026 as has been mentioned in para-06 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Chanho P.S. Case No.32 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-15.05.2026-Animesh/