Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11993 (ALL)

AINUL v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/34319/2026 · 2026-10-04

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34319 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.9 out of 278) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anit Kumar Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.233 of 2026, under Section 137(2), 143(4), 61(2) B.N.S., Police Station Teela Mod, District Ghaziabad, during the pendency of trial. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that the name of the applicant has come up in information received from a squealer, which has no evidentiary value in the eyes of law, and that the applicant has no criminal history, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant- Ainul, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 6. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. (Krishan Pahal,J.) October 5, 2026 (Ravi Kant) Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sandeep Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ainul .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad