Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11991 (MAD)

Manikandan v. State rep. by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/8062/2026 · 2026-04-01

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 8062 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 8062 of 2026 Manikandan S/o. Balakrishnan, No.04, Bajana Kovil Street, Thamaaraipakkam, Damaraipakkam, Tiruvallur District ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police Tank Factory Police Station Avadi, Chennai District. (Crime No.459 of 2025) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.459 of 2025 on the file of the respondent and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr. Camyles Gandhi W For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 303(2), 326(a) of BNS and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 8062 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.459 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The allegations against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with other accused was found in illegal transportation of two units of sand. Hence, the case. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this is the third anticipatory bail petition. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution’s case and, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has one previous case, similar in nature pending against him. Hence, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Here, the petitioner has one previous case of the same nature, which clearly demonstrates that the petitioner has misused the liberty granted by this Court. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 8062 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 01-04-2026 DRL To 1.The Inspector of Police Tank Factory Police Station Avadi, Chennai District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 8062 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 8062 of 2026 01-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis