Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:22617-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.9502 of 2026 Decided on: 17.06.2026 Sourabh Sharma … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner: Mr. Kul Bhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1-State. Dr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. No notice issued to respondent No.3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of subsequent developments, the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the petition, at this stage, with liberty that in case circumstances so warrant, he may approach the Court on the same cause as well as subsequent cause.
2. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge June 17, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?