Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11981 (AP)

PALADUGU VIMALA KUMARI v. V. MURALI KRISHNA

CC/2380/2025 · 2026-10-04

Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010439262025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No: 2380 of 2025 Between: 1. PALADUGU VIMALA ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/o.BRAHMANAPALLI VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. PALADUGU VIJENDRABABU,, S/O P VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O BRAHMANAPALLI VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 1. V MURALI KRISHNA, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GURAZALA DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI J MADHU BABU, TAHSILDAR, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): Mr.K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Contemnor(S): Mr. J DILEEP KUMAR 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 5th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No: 2380 of 2025 PALADUGU VIMALA KUMARI, W/o.PALADUGU VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/o.BRAHMANAPALLI VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. PALADUGU VIJENDRABABU,, S/O P VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O BRAHMANAPALLI VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, ...PETITIONER(S) AND V MURALI KRISHNA, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GURAZALA DIVISION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SRI J MADHU BABU, TAHSILDAR, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): for the Contemnor(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3209] KUMARI, W/o.PALADUGU VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/o.BRAHMANAPALLI VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA PALADUGU VIJENDRABABU,, S/O P VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O BRAHMANAPALLI VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, ...PETITIONER(S) V MURALI KRISHNA, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GURAZALA SRI J MADHU BABU, TAHSILDAR, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 The Court made the following order: It is represented by the counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the Contempt Case does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date: 05.10.2026 BLV 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA C.C.No.2380 of 2025 Dt: 05.10.2026 BLV