Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11973 (AP)

Ananthaneni Satya Narendra Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/5539/2017 · 2026-10-07

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010726372017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 5539/2017 Between: 1. ANANTHANENI SATYA NARENDRA KUMAR,, S/O.A.RAMA RAO, OCC: 30 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O.621- WORANGEPATH STREET, GLENDORA, CALIFORNIA, USA- 91741, REP. BY GPA HOLDER, SRI.A.RAMA RAO, S/O.VENKATA NARASAIAH,AGED 64 YEARS, OCC: RETIED EMPLOYEE, R/O.HUSSAIN NAGAR, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI. 2. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF, ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED, MARTUR TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITED, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. SANKAR LINGAM GUDIPADU VILLAGE, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY-CUM-PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, SANKAR LINGAM GUDIPADU VILLAGE, BALLIKURAVA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of respondents on petitioner's representation by way of legal notice dated 03.02.2017 submitted for prevention of erecting electrical lines and power supply to the encroachers who unauthorizedly raised thatched huts on the southern side of petitioner's landed property admeasuring Ac.1.25 cents in D.No.36/4 and Ac.3.70 cents in D.No.36/5 situated in Sankar Lingam Gudipadu Village, Ballikurava Mandal, Prakasam District through the lands of petitioner, as illegal, irregular, irrational, violative of provisions The Electricity Act,2003 and rules framed there under and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to erect electric lines and provide power supply to the encroachers who raised unauthorized thatched huts on the southern side of petitioner's said landed property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 6754 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider and decide the petitioners' representation submitted by way of legal notice dated 03.02.2017 for prevention of erecting electrical lines and power supply to the encroachers who unauthorizedly raised thatched huts on the southern side of petitioner's landed property admeasuring Ac.1.25 cents in D.No.36/4 and Ac.3.70 cents in D.No.36/5 situated in Sankar Lingam Gudipadu. Village, Ballikurava Mandal, Prakasam District through the lands, of petitioner before releasing any power supply, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this. Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. GP FOR ENERGY (AP) 3. N SIVA REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.5539 OF 2017 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that the cause in the present writ petition no longer survives for adjudication by this Court. 2. In view of the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 3. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date:-08.10.2026 BSM 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.5539 OF 2017 Date: 08-10-2026 W BSM