Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010172782026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2892/2026 ESTATE OF LATE NOBJAN BEWA REPRESENTED BY HER SON NURUDDIN, S/O LATE AKBAR ALI, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O VILL- GOPIGAON PART III, P.O.- LAKHIGANJ, P.S.- BILASIPARA, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS MD. NABAR UDDIN AND 4 ORS. SON OF LATE AKBAR ALI, R/O VILL- GOPIGAON PART III, P.O.- LAKHIGANJ, P.S.- BILASIPARA, DIST- DHUBRI, ASSAM 2:SOFIOR RAHMAN SON OF LATE HAZI SAMSHER ALI R/O VILL- SURJYAKHATA PART I P.O. AND P.S.- BILASIPARA DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM 3:SAHERA BEWA W/O SAHABUDDIN SK. D/O LATE AKBAR ALI R/O VILL- GOPIGAON PART III P.O.- LAKHIGANJ P.S.- BILASIPARA DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM 4:MOMINA BEWA W/O LATE NUR SALAM D/O LATE AKBAR ALI R/O VILL- GOPIGAON PART III P.O.- LAKHIGANJ Page No.# 2/3 P.S.- BILASIPARA DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM 5:RAHELA BEWA W/O LATE SAYED ALI D/O LATE AKBAR ALI R/O VILL- GOPIGAON PART III P.O.- LAKHIGANJ P.S.- BILASIPARA DIST- DHUBRI ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : K RAHMAN, MR. SAIDUL ALOM Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : ESTATE OF LATE NOBJAN BEWA REPRESENTED BY HER SON NURUDDIN S/O LATE AKBAR ALI R/O VILLAGE GOPIGAON PART III P.O. LAKHIGANJ P.S. BILASIPARA DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM VERSUS MD NABAR UDDIN S/O LATE AKBAR ALI R/O VILLAGE GOPIGAON PART III P.O. LAKHIGANJ P.S. BILASIPARA DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM. 2:SOFIOR RAHMAN S/O LATE HAZI SAMSHER ALI R/O VILLAGE SURIYAKHATA PART I P.O. P.S. BILASIPARA DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM ------------ Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for : MD KHALILUR RAHMAN Advocate for : appearing for MD NABAR UDDIN BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 24.08.2026 Heard Mr. K. Rahman, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of delay of 18 days in preferring the connected appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. This Court is of the opinion that going for issuing notice to the respondents would be nothing but sheer waste of time. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. Registry is directed to register the connected appeal and list the same for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant