ADITYA RAJ ALIAS OM SHANKAR KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./308/2026 · 2026-02-24
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1197 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1197 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5404 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 308 of 2026
--------- Aditya Raj @ Om Shankar Kumar, aged about 22 years, son of Pramod Kumar, resident of village Kishanpur, P.O. Kishanpur, P.S. Barbigha, Dist. Shikhpura (Bihar).
....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratik Sen, Advocate
Mr. Kaushal Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Spl. P.P.
--------- 02/ 24.02.2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 111(2)(ii)/111(3)/111(4)/317(5)/319(2)/318(4)/338/336(3)/340(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66(b), 66(C), 66(D) of the I.T. Act.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to some ulterior motive. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is a student and has no criminal antecedent. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 29.11.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court.
4. Learned Spl. P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation against the petitioner; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge (Cyber Crime),
2026:JHHC:5404 2 Giridih in connection with Giridih (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025.
6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 24th February, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 25.02.2026