Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11968 (ALL)

MUKESH JHA v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/35381/2026 · 2026-10-04

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35381 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No. 87 out of 278) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Ifrah Islam, learned State Officer and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.142 of 2026, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 3(5), 61(2) BNS and 66C, 66(D) I.T. Act, Police Station Barra, District Kanpur Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that similarly placed co-accused person Amit Singh has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 13.07.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 23619 of 2026 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. 5. Let the applicant- Mukesh Jha, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 6. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 5, 2026 Suraj Srivastav Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Krishan Pahal,J.) Mukesh Jha .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad