ANIL TYAGI AND 16 OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/40699/2026 · 2026-10-06
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, Siddhartha Varma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11966 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11966 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40699 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.
1. The petitioners, it appears, are aggrieved by the fact that his passage to the main road which connected plot nos. 271/1, 271/2, 272, 273 and 465 of village Pahadpur, Tehsil - Devband, District - Saharanpur had been affected by the actions of the respondent no. 2.
2. Learned Standing Counsel states that the petitioners can always approach under Section 25 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, before the relevant Authority in accordance with law.
3. Under such circumstances, we provide that if the petitioners file a fresh application under Section 25 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a period of 15 days from today then the same shall be considered by the relevant authority within a period two months thereafter in accordance with law.
4. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
5. This order was passed in the presence of Sri Pranjal Mehrotra and Sri Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal learned counsel for the respondents. October 7, 2026 PK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kaushlendra Singh, Rashmi Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra, Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Anil Tyagi And 16 Others .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad