Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11959 (PNJ)

USHA RANI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

RA-CW/186/2026 · 2026-04-10

Anoop Chitkara, Sukhvinder Kaur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SANGEETA 2026.04.10 15:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RA-CW-186-2026 in CWP-1307-2026 2 Scheduled Castes communiƟes, depending upon the populaƟon of the current geographical area of Panchkula at the Ɵme when the last Census was conducted, i.e., as per the Census of 2011. ” 4. It is always permissible to State of Haryana to issue a fresh noƟficaƟon based upon the populaƟon of current geographical limits of Panchkula, by taking into account the populaƟon of 2011 census as is menƟoned in paragraph No.30 (supra). 5. It is clarified that this order is only for the purpose of noƟfying seats for SC category in Municipal CorporaƟon, Panchkula. 6. Learned State Counsel submits that even in other MunicipaliƟes they have followed 2011 census but as on date we are not concerned with the other but concerned with Municipal CorporaƟon, Panchkula, and the judgment was only for Panchkula. 7. With the aforesaid observaƟon, present review peƟƟon stands disposed of. Copy of this order be given to State counsel under the signatures of Bench Secretary. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) April 10, 2026 JUDGE Sangeeta Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANGEETA 2026.04.10 15:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document