Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11958 (HP)

JAI RAM son of late Shri Bhagi Rath, Age about 60 years v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/6190/2026 · 2026-06-16

Ranjan Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:22537 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 6190 of 2026 Date of decision: 16.06.2026 _____________________________________________________________________________ Jai Ram ...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …Respondents. ____________________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 _____________________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No. 1-State. Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4-Himachal Road Transport Corporation. __________________________________________________________ Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Learned counsel for respondents-Corporation has placed on record copy of communication dated 15.06.2026, issued by Financial Advisor cum CAO, Himachal Road Transport Corporation to Branch Manager, H.P. State Co-Operative Bank, Ltd. Nerchowk, Mandi, forwarding PPO in favour of petitioner Jai Ram. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:22537 CWP No. 6190 of 2026 2. In view of above, present petition is closed and disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate remedy including filing fresh petition for redressal of any surviving grievance, with further direction to the respondents-Corporation to ensure action in furtherance to the aforesaid communication and PPO issued in favour of the petitioner for releasing all consequential benefits, including interest on delayed payment after expiry of three months from the date of retirement, in terms of Pension Rules, as applicable as well as pronouncements of Apex Court in case titled D.D Tewari (D) Thr. Lrs. vs. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors., reported in (2014) 8 SCC 894 and in case titled Dr. A. Selvaraj vs. C.B. M. College and Ors., reported in (2022) 4 SCC 627. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Ranjan Sharma), 16th June, 2026 (susheel) Judge.