Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11950 (PAT)

Pramod Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./6005/2026 · 2026-03-31

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6005 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-353 Year-2025 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1. Pramod Kumar S/O Ram Pravesh Rai R/O Village- Ushfa, P.S- Panchrukhiya, District - Patna. 2. Sudhir Kumar S/O Ram Pravesh Rai R/O Village- Ushfa, P.S- Panchrukhiya, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Mrs. X W/O Mr. Y R/O Village- Thakursthan, P.S- Chandi, Distt.-Nalanda. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 353/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 87, 140(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 4/6 of POCSO Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners are accused of abducting victim girls. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that though the victims in their statements recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6005 of 2026(3) dt.31-03-2026 2/2 have stated that they left their house on their own and later they got married to the petitioners. Petitioners have clean antecedent and they are in custody since 08.07.2025. The petitioners undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners on the ground that the victim girls have not undergone any medical test. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the statement of the victim girls under Section 180 B.N.S.S., this application for regular bail is allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif /concerned Court below in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 353/2025. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T