- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8865 WP No. 36229 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION No. 36229 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI M. K. NAGARAJU, S/O KEMAPAIAH @ KARIYAPPA, AGE ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDING AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, HAROHALLI TALUK, BANAGLORE SOUTH -562112. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SURESH K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI ARASAMMA, W/O SIDDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 2. SRI M. S. RAJESH, S/O SIDDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 3. SRI M. S. RAMYA D/O SIDDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, 4. SMT. GANGAMMA D/O SIDDALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8865 WP No. 36229 of 2025 5. KUM. KAVYA D/O SIDDALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, 6. SRI SIDDARAJU, S/O LATE MUNISANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 7. SRI SIDDALINGAIAH S/O LATE MUNISANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, ALL THE RESPONDENTS ARE RESIDING AT MARASANDRA VILLAGE, HAROHALLI HOBLI, HAROHALLI TALUK, BANAGLORE SOUTH - 562112. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTILCES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION FOR THE EARLY DISPOSAL OF THE ORIGINAL SUIT PROCEEDINGS IN OS No. 98/2022 PENDING BEFORE THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KANAKAPURA ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER Heard Sri K. Suresh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The present writ petition is filed seeking direction to the trial Court for early disposal of O.S.No.98/2022 pending before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Kanakapura. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8865 WP No. 36229 of 2025 Considering the limited prayer made, notice to respondents is dispensed with. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit is for partition. It is submitted that part of the 'A' schedule property is acquired by the National Highway Authority of India and in view of pendency of the above suit, the parties are not in a position to withdraw the compensation. 4. No sufficient cause is shown for early disposal of the suit. Having regard to the submission made that the parties to the suit are not in a position to withdraw the compensation and acquisition of part of the 'A' schedule property, the trial Court is requested to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. 5. Accordingly, petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19