Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1195 (JHR)

BINDU BARNABAS HANSDA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/6860/2025 · 2026-02-09

Rajesh Shankar

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. 2026:JHHC:3415-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 6860 of 2025 1. Bindu Barnabas Hansda, aged about 46 years, son of Daniel Hansda, 2. Binod Soren, aged about 20 years, son of Somay Soren, Both resident of Village Taljhari, P.O. & P.S. – Lalmatia, District – Godda (Jharkhand). ... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, 3. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Coal, A-Wing, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Marg, New Delhi, P.O. Hauz Khas, P.S.-Parliament Street, District New Delhi, State Delhi, 4. Deputy Commissioner, Godda, P.O.& P.S.-Godda, District- Chatra, 5. Circle Officer, Boarijor, P.O. & P.S.-Boarijor, District Godda, 6. Eastern Coalfield Limited through Chairman-Cum Managing Director, P.O. and P.S.-Dishergarh, District-Paschim Bardhaman, State West Bengal. 7. Area General Manager, Rajmahal Project, Eastern Coalfield Limited, Dhankunda, P.O. & P.S. – Lalmatia, District – Godda, State- Jharkhand. 8. General Manager, Operations, Rajmahal Project, Eastern Coalfields Limited, Dhankunda, P.O. & P.S. – Lalmatia, District – Godda, State- Jharkhand. ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioners: Mr. Avilash Kumar, Advocate Mr. Abhinav Kumar Agarwal, Advocate For the State: Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G. For the UOI: Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, Dy.S.G.I. Mr. Karbir, A.C. to Dy.S.G.I. --------- 02/Dated: 09.02.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing the matter for some time seeks liberty to withdraw this petition with liberty to the Neutral Citation No. 2026:JHHC:3415-DB petitioners and others to take out appropriate proceedings concerning their grievances that certain mandatory provisions of the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 were not followed, and also for considering their prayer for alternative site towards rehabilitation. 2. Leave is granted with liberty as prayed for. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. 4. All contentions of all parties are, however, left open. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) February 09, 2026 N.A.F.R. Manoj/ Sharda/Cp.2 Uploaded on 10-Feb-26